Thursday, January 31, 2008

Some Cold, Hard Facts About John "F--- You" McCain

Last night, the Republicans had another presidential debate and, like it or not McCainiacs, we saw that with Sen. John "F--- You" McCain, he will drip with contempt with anyone who disagrees with him on anything. And, a bitter, angry old man can not compete against either Sens. Hilary Clinton or St. Barack Obama.
Sen. "F--- You" McCain really hates former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney. His comment about his "patriotism over profit", besides a socialist broadside, shows contempt for someone who has been an American success story. He made his money the old fashioned way. Through hard work and perseverance. Mitt Romney is the opitimy of what the Republican party has stood for.
I must write this. I for one do not care about these things, as far as having a temper and all of that. But, I am NOT the average voter. And neither are you. I will overlook these things if Sen. "F--- You" is the Republican nominee. I do believe that he will prosucute the War Against Islamofacsist Terror better than a Democrat.
But this is the primary season and it is for each party to look at all of these candidates and hear what they have to say and read their positions and make our judgements. It is not a time after several primaries for either party to say one candidate has won a few races, lets just rally around that candidate. No, we have a right and an obligation to exam these candidates and how they stand on the issues.
And now is the time that we examine what Sen. "F--- You" McCain says now and what he has done as a senator.
The record is out there, but here is the brief overview:
A) Sen. "F--- You" McCain voted against the Bush tax cuts twice. It was not just because there were no spending cuts and or curtailing spending. It was because he felt that they were skewed towards "the rich", what ever that means. Clearly a Democrat talking point.
B) McCain-Feingold. This so-called "campaign finance reform" measure has put the Republican party at a huge disadvantage in fundraising and stifles the free speech rights of political contributors. This is a direct result of the McCain involvment in the Keating Five banking scandal of the late 1980s that nearly ended Sen. "F--- You" McCain's senate career. And, do not think that a Democrat will not bring this up during the election season. They will, and then some.
C) McCain-Kennedy "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" which was a window-dressing amnesty bill for 12 to 20 million illegal aliens. Sen. "F--- You" McCain's response to those who wanted border enforcement first, beginning with a border fence? "You can have your G-- D--- fence!" And his response to Texas senator John Cornym who brought reasonable objections to the bill? "F--- You! I know more about this bill than you will ever know!" BTW, hence the name "F--- You" McCain! But, Sen. "F--- You" McCain did not know a lot about the bill. How about the Z-visa? Oh, Sen. "F--- You" McCain was busy in New York, fundraising for his presidential bid. Thus he had to go back to Washington to save this abysmal bill.
D) McCain-Lieberman on "climate change". The fact that Sen. "F--- You" McCain even buys into this should disturb anyone. With absolutly no proof that globaloney warming is caused by humans, Sen "F--- You" McCain is ready once again to jump into bed with liberals. It is all on emotion, not substance. Before we do anything on globaloney warming, lets get some complete scientific study in place.
E) The TOTAL fight in the War Against Islamofacsist Terror. What I mean is that Sen. "F--- You" McCain is a one-step ahead, two-steps back warrior. Sen. "F--- You" McCain was correct on the surge and it has worked. But, he has a broad definition of "torture" and wanting to close down the prison at Guantanamo is two-steps back. Actually, bringing those prisoners here to the United States is three-steps back for they will be afforded the complete protection of the United States' legal system.
F) I am really sorry to bring these two, non political aspects to play. But, his role in the Keating Five banking scandal will be brought back to life. And there has been some negativity on how he divorced his first wife. I do not care if it is impolite, but we have to get real.
The Democrats want Sen. "F--- You" McCain badly. Imagine him spewing the way he did with Mr. Romney? Change to Sen. Clinton? How about Sen. St. Barack? The Democrats will pilory Sen. "F--- You" McCain just as they did to another insider the Republican establishment shoved down our throats, former Sen. Bob Dole.
Inside-the-beltway Republicans and other moderate sychophants do not seem to get it.
Yes, we are a nation at war. But, we want and need a candidate who can articulate that and also other issues that the American public will be thinking about in November. There is still an economy, job growth, health care, housing, education. Too many are focused on the war. And, they are losing sight of the striking differences that most Republicans have with Sen. "F--- You" McCain.
I want to win the election in November, but not this way. I do not want to settle. The Democrats did that last time in 2004 and look where it got them? I want a candidate that will take the fight to the Islamofacsists with all in their arsenal. No fear over technicalities. But, I also want that candidate to be forward looking. That means not looking to the Washington crowd but to the people who are hungering for principled, leadership.
That, my friends, is not Sen. John "F--- You" McCain.
It is really painful to write all of this. Had Sen. "F--- You" McCain been a different type of person, Republicans would unite around him and there would not be this acrimony.
We conservative Republicans do not have a perfect candidate. Mitt Romney is not perfect. But he is the kind of candidate that Ronald Reagan would have been looking at. Bringing people to his side and with a smile and conviction. That is what is lacking in Sen. "F--- You" McCain.
Last night, Sen. "F--- You" McCain looked bad and those who are overlooking all of this because of the war will have a lot of explaining to do when President Clinton II or President Obama took the oath of office because we Republicans just settled.

No comments: